As Lord Hunter pointed out in Thomson v. H.M.A. 1986 SLT 281, there has been quite a substantial development of the exception allowed by our law in cases of discovery of adultery. That that is so is apparent from the more recent authorities of McKay v. H.M.A. 1991 SCCR 364 and Rutherford v. H.M.A. 1997 SCCR 711.
HMA v Rutherford 1947: Case of assisted suicide, mens read of intention to murder was not satisfied but guilty of culpable homicide. Death is casually linking to an assault, but may not be the foreseeable outcome of the assault. Woman collapsed and died after minor assault. Accused convicted of culpable homicide. HM Advocate v Rutherford 1947 JC 1 established that consent is no defence to a charge of murder. In Smart v HM Advocate 1975 SLT 65 the accused's appeal against a conviction to assault was rejected, despite the victim having consented to a "square go." Rutherford V The United States Trial. Complete text of 1918 trial of J.F. Rutherford and 7 other leaders of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (later known as Jehovah's Witnesses) for violating the Espionage Act. On 04/24/2019 PEOPLE OF THE STATE filed an Other court case against RUTHERFORD in Riverside County Superior Courts. Court records for this case are available from Riverside Historic Courthouse.
Son of John Rutherford III and Violet Reynolds Born ca 1727 Essex Cty Va Married unknown Died ca 1799, after 1799. Early settler of Grayson Cty Va. Children Thomas II
Son of John Rutherford III and Violet Reynolds Born ca 1727 Essex Cty Va Married unknown Died ca 1799, after 1799. Early settler of Grayson Cty Va. Children Thomas II 1138 Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 526 (1984); Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576(1984) (holding also that prison security needs support a rule prohibiting pre-trial detainees contact visits with spouses, children, relatives, and friends). 1139 Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 530 (1984). 1140 Hudson v.
Rutherford V The United States Trial. Complete text of 1918 trial of J.F. Rutherford and 7 other leaders of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (later known as Jehovah's Witnesses) for violating the Espionage Act.
Harris v HMA 2010 - conduct must affect the public peace for breach of the peace Man verbally threatened 2 police offers on separate attempts and said this was not breach of the peace but court said they didn't need to define public disturbance and they were charged. Rutherford v Miln  ScotCS CSIH - 6 13 Dec 1940 scs Scotland [ Bailii] O'Hara v Central Scotland Motor Traction Co. Ltd  ScotCS CSIH - 1 25 Mar 1941 scs Scotland [ Bailii] Hma v Hill  ScotHC HCJ - 1 16 Apr 1941 HCJ Scotland, Crime [ Bailii] Inglis v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co  ScotCS CSIH - 2 3 Jul 1941 scs Deorle sued Rutherford, Mick Grey (the Butte County Sheriff), the County of Butte, and Defense Technology Corporation (the manufacturer of the cloth-cased shot), for, among other things, excessive force in violation of the fourth amendment. Rutherford and Grey asserted qualified immunity and moved for summary judgment. The case brief underlines that the lawsuit of Block v Rutherford was revised by the Supreme Court of the USA to resolve the issue whether the rules of Central Jail infringed the prisoner`s rights or whether it was explained to maintain the security. HMA v AZEEM ASLAM & ZEESHAN ASLAM. At the High Court in Glasgow Lord Stewart sentenced Azeem and Zeeshan Aslam after they were convicted of the culpable homicide of Anthony Dryden on 23 March 2013 at Stonefield Street, Airdrie.